Searching...
Muhammad Ali

Muhammad Ali

Post-Crisis

Comments

MoNsTeR
MoNsTeR 3 y 29 d
Muhammad Ali
56 months member
7.3M
aajayunlimited
aajayunlimited 3 y 11 mo 4 d
Muhammad Ali
89 months member
46.6K
This photo is used, because it is closer to his fighting prime(his peak years of ability). That was from 64-67 not the mid 70s. The former photo is mid 70s-ish. He was still a great fighter then, but was not the same athletically. In my opinion, the prime guy beats all but 2 fighters in boxing history(only 2 guys had a shot--Frazier and Foreman). The mid-70s version beats those 2 guys(proven), but loses to more fighters than the prime guy. In the mid-70s, Marciano, Young, Norton, Holmes, Tyson, Walcott, Charles, Dempsey, Lewis(Lennox), and add to that any high energy guy that was any good. These guys and more would now have a good or better shot. That's the difference in the 2 versions. The mid-70s and later versions would lose far more fights than the one from 64-67...
show 7 replies
Galactus
Galactus 3 y 11 mo 4 d
Muhammad Ali
8+ year member
1.9M
But this photo is unproportionally scaled, he looks squashed.